Almost tyrants
Without a front-line pitcher, opponents will not fear the Phillies.
"The Phillies need a front-line pitcher."
The line has been repeated so many times, it’s lost meaning.
Months removed from the final game of 2005, the mention of a front-line pitcher conjures up images of Roger Clemens, Johan Santana and Dontrelle Willis.
But during the season, a front-line starter doesn’t need to throw a single pitch to be effective, or leave a trace in the stat sheets.
The threat of him can be enough.
The Phillies know this well. They entered such a situation on July 25, when they traveled to Houston for three games with the surging Astros. No pitch was even thrown, and the Astros had already swept.
As prophesized by every paper in the city, as shivered over by every fan, the Phillies were dusted out of Houston, 1-2-3, just as feared. Led by two dominant performances by Andy Pettitte and Roy Oswalt, followed by a solid outing from an ailing Roger Clemens, the Phillies were hurled further back in the Wild Card standings, managing to score only four runs the entire series. Later in the season, in a series beginning Sept. 5, the Phillies had their chances, but were swept once again, this time at home, completing the Astros' season sweep.
When it was all said and done, only one game separated the Phillies and Astros in the final standings, but they were leagues apart in pitching, which helped guide them to the World Series. The Phillies could never match what the Astros could do: batter you with intimidation, fry you with pitching, and always know that a win was only one day away.
Unless nothing else is done before April, there isn’t a team in the league that will enter a series with the Phillies knowing they have no shot at winning, just as the Phillies knew in that Houston series. There isn’t a single pitcher -- starter or otherwise -- that will send pangs of fear through opposing hitters.
Billy Wagner had that, but he’s gone. He was the only pitcher who had "it."
One benefit of having a closer like Wagner was having a presence that reverberated into the middle innings of a close game. Opponents knew they must not surrender the lead or their chances of winning would be slim.
On the mound, he could represent shear tyranny. Wagner could tear hitters down, embarrass them, make them regret ever putting on a uniform. Wagner could break a team’s spirit so badly, it would carry over to the next day.
A.I.: Artificial Intimidation
Let's face it: The Phillies want a front-line pitcher, and can't have one. The only thing they can do now is continue to work the edges.
One reason I advocate having at least one fire-baller in the bullpen, regardless of control, is having someone to get the blood flowing when a game seems lost, or to trample the opposing team’s spirits when the coast is clear.
I love the idea of Yoel Hernandez, the minor league closer who lead the Venezuelan winter league in saves. He’s clocked in the high-90s and keeps his ERA in check. Having a young pitcher like that, to pitch in low-pressure spots, would at least give kids something to watch in the eighth-inning of a one-sided game. It might also give the team an emergency charge in a desperate situation.
Playtime GM:
David Bell, cash, to Kansas City for 21-year-old fireball relief pitcher Ambiorix Burgos.











Playtime GM: David Bell and cash to anyone in return for a case of Yuengling Black & Tan.
Seriously though, lots of people suggest shipping Bell to KC, but do they really need a thirdbaseman? Isn't Teahan the starter there?
Posted by: Tom G | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 03:22 PM
I don't want anyone to think that I have got myself some Jonestown-quality KoolAid, but I decided to take a look at the numbers of last year's world champion White Sox pitching staff. Looking at the numbers from 2004, below, you'll see that besides Buehrle and perhaps Garcia (whose numbers were weird, a bad W-L% in Seattle with a low ERA, followed by a good W-L% and bad ERA on the South Side) there pitching staff looked good, but not great. They had to overcome some Gammons-esque "ifs" to win. El Duque was a big question mark, as were Contreras and Garland.
2004 Numbers
Mark Buehrle
16-10 3.89ERA 245.1IP 257H 51BB 165K
Jose Contreras
13-9 5.47ERA 170.1IP 166H 84BB 150K
Fredy Garcia
13-11 3.83ERA 210IP 192H 64BB 184K
Jon Garland
12-11 4.89ERA 217IP 223H 76BB 113K
Orlando Hernandez
8-2 3.30ERA 84.2IP 73H 36BB 84K
So while I agree with JW that I'd sleep much better with a dominant pitcher on the staff, I'm not going to get too worked up about it at present... esp. if it means that we need to give up too much to get a 1A starter. Myers may yet surprise us.
Posted by: MPN | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 04:00 PM
A case of Black & Tan is too steep. I'd take a bag of peanuts.
Posted by: Dick Richards | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 04:22 PM
Tom G: Ever play little league on a team where the coach keeps trotting out his kid, who can't catch, to play third base?
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 04:24 PM
JW - Yes, and that kid was me...Why?
Posted by: Tom G | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 05:31 PM
i agree with MPN, ive thought all winter that we shouldnt trade abreu for anything less than a playoff proven (and fairly young) ace for the simple fact that i think this is the season myers makes "the jump" as long as he has the ability to put down the pizza.
the phils can make the playoffs with this pitching staff as currently constructed, it would just be a helluva lot easier with a schilling-type pitcher getting the ball on opening day
Posted by: pat | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 05:39 PM
UPDATE: I goofed on the information regarding the away Astros series. It has been fixed and added to.
Tom G: Bell is the kid and his dad is the coach in KC.
As a fan, describe your opening-day state of mind having Doug Mankiewicz as your first baseman and David Bell at third.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 06:03 PM
I got it J-Dub, I was just being a dork...[except for the part about being trotted out to third... my dad did try desperately to play me at third, but it was apparent i had no arm, so i was moved to second]
Posted by: Tom G | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 06:08 PM
It might hurt the premise a bit to point out that Wagner blew a couple of those Astro games, despite his front line, fear inducing status.
Posted by: BlueMan | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 07:32 PM
JW- Everyone knows that we don't have that stud and how good this nucleus would be if we had one. But the fact is,how do we go about it and who would you give up to do it? It's obvious it'll take more than Bobby Abreu.Sayinmg it is one thing pulling it off is another.But I'm all for it.Even if we have to trade more then it is worth.Or "pay more" for that matter.
Posted by: Joe E. | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 07:51 PM
Joe E:
You develop pitching in your own system. There's no other way to do it. Further down the list is trading for one, and even further down is free agency. If the Phillies want to play the game of buying pitching, they will be burned. With the exception of Gordon, Gillick waived off temptation and said no to the 2006 free agents, and I'm mostly glad for it ...
... except that I'm still not happy with the '06 rotation.
Next option is trading, specifically, trading Bobby. They run the risk of getting burned, but it's a risk I think most fans are willing to take. Names like Contreras, Bedard, Marquis (all mentioned in rumors) are realistic returns, and pitchers I would consider, but I'd rather wait.
You ask what I think they should do? There it is: wait. Be patient. I don't see any team running away with the East. I'm looking at deadline time now as a good leverage spot to deal for pitching ... if they need it. For now, the best thing to do is find out whether the "ifs," as MPN mentioned, can happen. And if they can, they still have Bobby.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 08:24 PM
Just to not appear a total hypocrite, I've pointed out here and elsewhere that I'd have traded Bobby for a 1C/2 pitcher like Derek Lowe if we'd have also received someone like Joel Guzman or Andy LaRoche in return, but apparently that was never in the cards. #1 starters are becoming as rare of commodities as top notch centers in the NBA.
Posted by: MPN | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 08:30 PM
BlueMan:
That comment sank my battleship. Not every Beerleaguer post is a hit. Today's was definitely a miss.
Time to move on and discuss Canada's WBC roster.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Monday, February 13, 2006 at 10:06 PM
Jason, whoa there on the misery of the beerleaguer bested. Your point stands - we will need an intimidating pitcher down the stretch if we're to stand a chance. And I agree with you that the deadline is going to give us leverege on bobby. If Gillick and his team's appraisal of younger pithers is up to scratch, then I hope he's scouring every pitching rich organisation (yes, all two of 'em), looking for the teams that could come close by july and will have pitching to spare, preferably a dominating number two who the phillies think can make the jump. It's still a lot of ifs and buts tho'.
Posted by: Oisin | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 05:21 AM
The comment above about developing your own pitching first, then using trades, and as a last resort signing free agents, is sound and I believe correct. In this regard the Phillies really puzzle me.
Where I have trouble is with the fact that for a team apparently so desperate for starting pitching, the Phillies do not seem particularly interested in finding out what their own prospects can really do. There were 4 young potential starters pitching out of the bullpen in 2005. 4. Other than Gavin Floyd, who was not ready, the Phillies still have no idea if any of the other three can succeed as starters. They have never really been given the chance. Madson will finally get a shot in 2006 after being sidetracked for 2 seasons pitching middle relief. Nobody really knows what Tejeda or Brito can do. When is the team intending to find out?
Wouldn't it be better to give them extended looks this season rather than giving Ryan Franklin 30 starts? Put Franklin in long relief to start the season and let Brito or Tejeda have the #5 spot in the rotation until Wolf comes back. Maybe they both get about 8-10 starts or so. Worse case scenario would be that they fail and then you at least know. And if they both fail you put Franklin back in. But if one or more of them blossom, you can potentially avoid trading away all-star caliber talent for a #1 starter or paying through the nose for one next FA period. It gives you options.
And Gillick should not let CM's penchant for overworking his bullpen lead to sidetracking the development of potential starters for short-term bullpen fixes.
Posted by: George S | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 10:58 AM
I believe Tejeda has earned a very long look as a starter. The Phillies are mismanaging him like they have mismanaged many young pitchers in the past. Steady work, and the belief he will be given an honest shot, might do wonders for him. He more than held his own for most of his appearances last year and a little confidence and support might produce even better results this year. He has a live arm, a fluid delivery and seems impervious to pressure.
Then, there is Franklin.
Posted by: Tom Goodman | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 01:53 PM