Things continue to disintegrate for the 3-10 Phillies, but the latest situation has the potential to bring the whole house down. According to the Daily News, Ryan Howard, who pulled up lame beating out a play at first base, suffered an injury around his left knee.
Originally thought to be harmless thigh strain, Howard played all 13 innings out of necessity because the bench had been used up and actually made a fine diving stab at first. However, a post-game examination revealed the injury was sustained around his knee. According to the report, he underwent X-rays last night at RFK Stadium and is scheduled to undergo an MRI this morning.
Marcus Hayes, who wrote the story for the Daily News, suggests the Phils could move Chase Utley to first base and play utility infielder Abraham Nunez at second. Other combinations could include Wes Helms at first with Nunez at third, or recalling Chris Coste from Triple-A Ottawa to join the mix. A roster move is likely to replace Howard at least temporarily.
Obviously, this is more bad news for a collapsing ballclub. Judging from the incident, my expert blogger opinion says hyperextended knee, with some type of ligiment injury, praying on bended knee it isn't an ACL tear.
Offense comes up lame in 5-4 loss
Last night’s agonizing loss came courtesy of the top four table setters – Jimmy Rollins, Shane Victorino, Chase Utley and Ryan Howard – who went a combined 2 for 21 with three walks.
According to Elias Sports Bureau, the Phillies have left 131 runners on base in 13 games this season, the highest total for any big-league team over its first 13 games since the Tigers stranded 132 runners in their first 13 games back in 1970 (Thanks to Tray for the tip).
Brett Myers pitched an effective inning, his first in relief. Antonio Alfonseca and Ryan Madson did commendable jobs holding Nats scoreless through four innings, two apiece. Matt Smith battled again with his command and is now a prime candidate for a ticket to Ottawa. Reclamation project Francisco Rosario also battled with command and eventually took the loss in the 13th.
Veteran writer weighs in on Phillies’ state of despair
Brett Myers demotion to the bullpen is a desperate act no matter how you spin it. That’s how columnist Rich Hofmann approached the subject in his account of yesterday's chaotic news day. I really liked this piece; Hofmann did an outstanding job brining all the issues to the forefront and his positions were on target. [Link]
Phillies able to keep Condrey, Durbin
Right-hander Clay Condrey, who was designated for assignment to make room for Freddy Garcia, has cleared waivers yesterday and has been outrighted to triple-A Ottawa and has agreed to rejoin the Phillies. In addition, right-hander J.D. Durbin, who was picked up on waivers and was immediately designated for assignment, also cleared waivers and has been optioned to Ottawa.
It just goes to show that if they’re not good enough for the Phillies bullpen ...
Kidding aside, Durbin is young, talented and a low-risk, high reward bullpen part to stash away as inventory. The hard-throwing hurler was rated as the Twins 10th best prospect this season, but has had numerous injury setbacks.















Jason, you forgot to mention the good points from last nights game. We discovered that Cole Hamels is a more effective PH than our buddy Abe Nunez. Get King Cole a 1B glove!!
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:20 AM
hope its nothing serious with howard . moving helms to 1B, recalling coste, and platooning nunez/coste at 3B seems the least invasive move to make if howard is temporarily DL'd. it'd probably even improve the defense. of course, a major shakeup couldn't hurt the team at this point, but utley at 1B and nunez full-time at 2B is not something i want to see.
"It just goes to show that if they’re not good enough for the Phillies bullpen ..."
my thinking exactly....!
my question--who do you recall if you send down matt smith, who clearly needs some time in AAA to work on his command? bisenius again?
Posted by: bathtubhippo | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:21 AM
I wonder if Cole could play first. I bet he could.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:22 AM
My thoughts on the Myers to the bullpen move. I agree that it was done to add some value to Lieber in preparation for a trade. My only hope is that every Lieber start from now on end with him being yanked after 1 inning for Myers. Teach his candy-ass to cry about not being a starter.
JW, although I said it jokingly, Hamels does seem to be one of the guys on this team who would do anything asked of him. Since we have a history of a black hole at 7-8-9 anyway, give him a start at 1B, why not? At 3-10, who are you going to upset?
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:34 AM
i think it was amazing that eaton got hit in the hand with a linedrive and didn't snap in half.
matt smith's appearance was really pathetic. he doesn't belong on a major league roster right now. in fact, if he weren't a lefty, he wouldn't be on one.
it was almost funny to listen to the nats fans discover the phils' ERAs with each new pitcher into the game: 7.50, 13.50, 6.95, 9.95. "who are these guys?" wish we knew.
Posted by: gr | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:43 AM
@Willard
Well... mostly losing your now best Starting Pitcher to injury from playing First Base... That would be something to lose...
Posted by: Mike Cunningham | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:44 AM
Oh happy days. We managed to hang onto the Minnesota Twins 10th best prospect (only because the other 29 teams passed on him).
Posted by: curt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:45 AM
No one is mentioning the mangers move in the 7th. Taking out Smith before the pinch hitter for the Nats was announced, giving them an extra player.
Venture a guess what that player did in the 13th??
It's brutal and getting worse every day.
Posted by: Jesse Livermore | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:55 AM
no, curt, 29 other teams didn't pass on him. the Red Sox and Diamondbacks both claimed him before we did, but couldn't find a spot for him on their ML rosters.
there's a lot of bad things going on in Philliesland the last few days, but managing to get a talented, if raw, pitcher like Durbin on your AAA roster isn't one of them.
Posted by: ae | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:56 AM
Helms to 1st, Coste to 3rd makes the most sense to me. Or Burrell to first and we can insert that power hitting top OF prospect _______ in there for him...Doh, we don't have any of those.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 09:56 AM
regarding the myers move to the pen, perhaps flash is hurt.
Posted by: gr | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:02 AM
Helms to 1st, Dobbs at 3rd. This offense is already horrible, putting Nunez in the lineup is suicide!
Coste needs to be recalled so he can show he should be Ruiz's backup and then to hell with Barajas.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:07 AM
I say we just put Coste on first. Didn't he sub for Ryno a couple days last season and actually do good?
Posted by: ZT | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:09 AM
The sh*tfest needs to stop. I can't take an entire season of this, and neither can the fanbase. They'll show up for a while, but before long it will like like the 10,000 fan crowds at the spacious Vet soon...you'll hear nothing but crickets and boos.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:10 AM
Thanks for the clarification, ae. Two teams were interested but not interested enough to find room for him on their 40 man rosters. Sure, it was a worthwhile pickup, but only because the Phils farm system is another disaster area.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:13 AM
From philly.com: So in his mind Manuel doesn't need to be concerned, even after a 3-10 start?
"No, not at all," Gillick said.
Alright, enough about the manager, then. I can't *fathom* how he's still at the helm, but man... since you're staying, can you change the effing lineup a bit?
If Howard is DL'd?
1. Rollins SS
2. Dobbs 3B, he hit in spring training -- give him a chance, please.
3. Burrell LF, keep it up, fella.
4. Utley 2B/1B, stop pressing. Everyone loves everything about you.
5. Helms/Coste 1B, get Coste the hell out of Ottawa, please.
6. Rowand CF
7. Ruiz C, and please stop swinging first pitch.
8. Victorino
9. Cole Hamels. Everyday.
And for the record, all these moves, all of them? Could they not have been tried and made during effing spring training? It's infuriating.
But what do I know, I'm just a diehard fan on the brink of burning his Phillies hat.
Posted by: JZ | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Greg Dobbs to Third, Wes Helms to First. Bring up Coste from AAA to see if he can produce as a back-up catcher again.
Posted by: primodudes | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:23 AM
last night was like a battle of mediocrity. the longer the game lasted the more painful it seemed.
Posted by: ci | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:25 AM
after the mets game, before all the charlie/eskin stuff and before the myers to the pen shat, i said i was as frustrated as i've been since cbp opened.
i am now back to a pre-cbp state of mind. this team, especially now with howard out, has zero chance of making the playoffs.
they might as well be the 76ers to me - playing for nothing. the only question i ask myself now is "do i trust PG to trade the right pieces to make this a contending team for next year?"
every single player that won't be a part of the team next year needs to be traded for value. can he get back a gio gonzalez type prospect for garcia? can he get anything at all for lieber and rowand? if i'm burrell there is no way i don't waive my no trade clause now. if PG can't get quality big league pieces for the players they have to trade there is no way all the holes get filled in free agency. it'd be too much money - the holes are too big.
Posted by: Tim | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:44 AM
I was there last night, and it was as bad in person as it was on tv. Not a whole lot of people there, but the Phils were well represented.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:45 AM
ci, not mediocrity, it was 2 bad teams. The difference is that one was expected to compete for the division as the team to beat, the other was picked as a last place club.
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:46 AM
Question: There are a ton of Washington area readers here, and my analytic data confirms it. Can any of you recommend a Philadelphia sports hangout in DC I can solicit for some ad revenue?
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:49 AM
gee...happy we depleted the bench so early on the MVP had to play after f**ing up his knee, really hope you didn't just blow this guy's entire career CM. You know, sometimes when you have knee damage, and you keep putting weight on, the damage can be irrerversible. Let gdamn Ryan Madson play first base. I don't care. He shouldn't have been out there, period. Were 3-10, why in god's name would we risk making a guy play through an injury?
And you know whose fault this is. Pat Gillick. Its PG's fault. He gave up on this team and they came back last year and played hard. They came up short but they tried. And then this year , the management goes out and get's them yes, a good pitcher, and no one else. No one else to help them. I don't think the ownership hired Giles for any other reason than to rebuild this ball club, not to put together a winner. He said as much himself last year. And this organization thinks so inside the box, and is so stubborn and uninventive, they figured this offseason, let's not spend alot of money and bring in the few pieces we have missing (Oh wow, two RP, an OF and a 3B who could hit .270 and actually play his damn poistion) No, they came up with that stupid stupid ad campaign, beat the war drum, and then picked up rule V guys and worn out, beaten down, journeyman.
Yeah, I have goosebumps, and now our Best Hitter and the person who should be the face of the organization has a bum knee.
Congratulations Phils, you really came out and proved something to the muts and the rest of the League: that your a predictable organization who hires predictable managers who can demoralize a team in less than three weeks.
Posted by: mm | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:50 AM
It is now time for the Phillies spin machine to start up. What is the over/under on the number of times we hear that “the season would have been better if Howard had not been injured. We’ll get ‘em next year”.
Posted by: The Iron Pig | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:55 AM
I guess i was just really trying to place blame for happenstance, which isn't fair, especially with Howard hurting himself. Still, thats why you don't ever empty your entire bench.
Posted by: mm | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:55 AM
Hey A-Rod, can you please give Howard and Utley back their Steroids...
Posted by: phanatics brother | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10:59 AM
In retrospect is this a suprise? One strength starting pitching is really not as good as we thought. Did we really expect much out of Eaton and Krispy Kreme Boy? Myers has great potential but has been an enigma for years. Garcia has been a great pitcher for years but his velocity was dropping even last year. Jamie Moyer has been a dependable pitcher but he is 44 years old. The future ace, Cole Hamels, is still learning to pitch in the majors.
The other strength hitting has 2 players from last year, Burrell and Howard, who were bad at hitting with runners in scoring position.
We knew going into the season that the pen and bench would be weak.
Looking at the facts, is it really a surprise at the way things turned out?
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:01 AM
"Is it really a surprise at the way things turned out?"
I've got to admit, I was caught off guard by their 3-10 start actually, the worst in 25 years.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:05 AM
I hate the management of this team, but will someone PLEASE blame the core hitters for consistently not getting it done?!? Last night was yet another example of missed opportunities.
J-Can't think of any Phillies bars down here, but Rhino Bar & Pumphouse (georgetown bar) is a big Eagles bar, as well as Rock Bottom Brewery (in the Ballston section of Arlington).
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Staring pitching hasn't been the problem. Some so-so starts, for sure, but our problems are our hitters not hitting, and of course, the 'pen. Garcia's velocity was down last year, but he finished well. He was ok in his first outing the other night. Hamels has looked pretty good. Moyer/Lieber/Eaton will hold down the fort. Everyone else has to grow a pair and step up.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:10 AM
I really hope that Howard is not badly hurt. Ryan is a great hitter and a good guy from all accounts. The league needs more guys like him.
Posted by: Ed in Westchester | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:10 AM
If Hayes is right, putting Abe at 2B would be an absolute travesty.
Is there a bigger dropoff in offensive talent than going from Ryan Howard to Abraham Nunez? Bonds to Sandoval?
Since we are doing fixes, I would move Burrell to 1st (if he can play there) and put Bourn in LF. I know this is COnlin's wet dream of a speedy, powerless OF, but I think Bourn is really the only guy who could make a real difference.
Then you go:
J-Roll
Bourn
Burrell
Utley
Helms
Rowand
Vic
Ruiz
If Pat the Bat can't hack it at first, then Coste plays 3rd, Helms moves to 1st.
If they really put Nunez in the everyday lineup, I will officially quit on this team.
I'm thinking of following the D-Rays. Their struggles will remind me of the mid 90s Phils, and they have all sorts of exciting players who could steal a base, hit a HR, or attack an umpire.
Not to be cynical, but maybe we could get a poll going on what team you would adopt after giving up on the Phils. I think the only restriction would be that it can't be a NL team.
Posted by: kdon | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:12 AM
3-10 isn't reflective of the available talent. Now that the pressure is off, we can probably anticipate .500 ball the rest of the way.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:15 AM
Kdon:
Red Sox or Orioles (I live in Delaware, so it is close enough).
Posted by: The Iron Pig | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:18 AM
"Last night’s agonizing loss came courtesy of the top four table setters – Jimmy Rollins, Shane Victorino, Chase Utley and Ryan Howard – who went a combined 2 for 21 with three walks."
Not to rub salt in our own wounds here, but I do feel I should point out that even this quote is a little misleading. The guy on this list who many believe is one of the weak links on this team, and has never been to an All-Star game was 2-5 with a BB and SB.
So actually, the guys we are counting on to carry this team went 0-16 with 2BB... against the (2nd counting us) worst team in the division.
Just for the hell of it, since I am a glutton for punishment (aka Philly sports fan) lets look at the upside of this.
Mad Dog finally threw a couple decent innings, and Eaton looked okay, as did Myers in his first BP appearance.
Ryan ain't hitting any way, let him spend 15 days on the DL. Call up Coste to play first.
When Coste performs, and the team wins a couple games, Ryan comes back feeling less pressure and there is no way they send Coste back if he out-performs the current bunch of bench losers.
I know, I know, but it is still April and I can't bring myself to quit yet.
Posted by: yt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Wouldn't we all be A's fans historically? I like their kind of ball, too....
Posted by: Mike H. | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:25 AM
I'm down Mike, as long as we call them the Philadelphia Athletics of Oakland.
The San Francisco Baseball Giants could be our rivals.
Posted by: yt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:29 AM
It will be interesting to see what Gillick can get in return for all the soon-to-be ex-Phillies. Probably only 3-4 guys out there stretching at RFK who are assured to be back next year.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:30 AM
We're allowed to be A's fans. They won more in 50 years than the Sillies have in 100. We should have sent the Phillies packing in 54 and kept the Elephants.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:33 AM
Hey, at least we're still "the team to beat." Unfortunately, we're the team to beat repeatedly.
Posted by: Willard Preacher | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:53 AM
I like the A's too. Not so much because of Moneyball, but because of the odd facial hair. Even Piazza has gotten on board the scruffy look.
Having the Giants as a rival is much better than the Mets too. If there was one team in baseball that is set up to be simply awful for awhile, it the Giants.
Posted by: kdon | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:57 AM
In no uncertain terms, it is never okay to refer to the "Phillies" as the "Sillies," even in these dark times.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:57 AM
@Curt
Do you really think Stand Pat is going to do a complete 180 and become this aggressive leader of a rebuilding effort? Seems unlikely to me. I can see him dumping Burrell and 5M for some B and C prospects, maybe even unloading Garcia if there is a market and he's healthy, but you're not going to get a rapid overhaul of this team, nor do you really need to IMO. This team was just constructed poorly in the offeason, obvious needs were not met, the inaction on the Lieber for reliever front is pretty unforgivable, but the core IS there for success. The philosophy of general management isn't. It's my feeling that the fish stinks from the head down in Philly, and I'm referring to ownership...
Posted by: Lister | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Did everyone miss the line in Hoffman's piece that Charlie campaigned to keep Coste on the team? It begs two questions:
1.)Is there a rift between Manuel and Gillick and, if so, what is Gillick waiting for to fire Manuel?
and
2.)Can everyone please give Manuel some credit for wanting to keep Coste?
Posted by: Matt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 11:59 AM
General manager Pat Gillick said X-rays done Wednesday showed nothing was torn and that Howard wouldn't need to have an MRI exam. Gillick also said he didn't think Howard would have to go on the disabled list.
Posted by: fljerry | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:00 PM
Today's lineups
Phils
1. J Rollins, SS
2. S Victorino, RF
3. C Utley, 2B
4. P Burrell, LF
5. G Dobbs, 1B
6. W Helms, 3B
7. A Rowand, CF
8. C Ruiz, C
9. J Moyer, P
Nats
1. F Lopez, SS
2. R Belliard, 2B
3. R Zimmerman, 3B
4. D Young, 1B
5. A Kearns, RF
6. R Church, CF
7. M Restovich, LF
8. J Flores, C
9. J Patterson, P
Posted by: Billy Mac | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:06 PM
" the inaction on the Lieber for reliever front is pretty unforgivable"
Apparently, Lieber had little or no value in the market. There was the Turnbow/Mench trade rumor, but I don't know how serious that was. Would you have wanted junk back? I understand frustration-I'm frustrated, but let's not pretend Lieber wasn't shopped.
Additionally-Besides, J-Roll, Chase, Howard, Hamels and probably Myers (who for the most part aren't going anywhere), what else does this organization have that anybody really wants (right now)?
Burrell is stepping up, but doesn't really have his power stroke. I don't see any team wanting him as a high priced singles/strike out guy.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:09 PM
I can't get enough Victorino high in the lineup these days.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:09 PM
The iron pig is so dead on. If The Black Bull misses any significant time that will be the excuse managment uses for this debacle. Again, I cant believe I am typing the words "Howard Eskin is right"
Posted by: That Dude | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:14 PM
Lister, you tried to push this "trade Burrell and $5M for B/C prospects" line yesterday, and it's just as ridiculous now as it was then.
first, us paying another team to take Burrell is the height of idiocy. he's only signed through next year, and his salary isn't unreasonable in the current market (just look at Carlos Lee, who's older, a worse defender, and doesn't draw walks).
second, B/C prospects (which, parenthetically, are not what we got in the Abreu trade. John Sickels, for one, only rated Matt Smith a C this year; everyone else from that deal was below that) are not going to help this team. what good is a fringe reliever or a utility infielder going to do for the long-term prospects of this team? the answer is none.
now by all means, if you can get a guy on the Gio Gonzalez level for one of our players, you do it. but another wave of CJ Henrys (and please, don't trot out that "well, he was the Yankees' first round draft choice" argument - it holds no water) is not going to do anything to change this team's prospects this year, next year, five years from now, or ten years from now.
Posted by: ae | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:18 PM
Howard is listed as day-day, not in lineup today, as seen on espn bottomline, some good news
Posted by: bsg | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Reality is they are 3-10 with Howard and tied for worst record in baseball how much lower could they go?
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:23 PM
"In no uncertain terms, it is never okay to refer to the "Phillies" as the "Sillies," even in these dark times."
i agree, and, also, just snorted coffee out of my nose.
Posted by: bathtubhippo | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:25 PM
Well you got to figure Utley (big new contract), Howard (cheap stud) and Hamels (cheap stud) are back for sure next year. Rollins and Myers are the two guys who might get us a couple of top talents in return. Garcia, Rowand, Lieber and anyone else who is a FA next year is gone as soon as an offer is received. Burrell too. Vic or Bourn will be back (cheap and potentially competent). The rest are obvious available in the right trade, and 8-10 of them probably don't belong on a ML roster. Gordon and Moyers belong, but it's hard to believe they will have anything left.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Time for Greg Dobbs to turn into Roy Hobbs.
Posted by: The Iron Pig | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:33 PM
I was totally on board the trade Burrell now train last season, if we could have kept Bobby and moved Pat that would have been great.
But no way do you trade Pat right now. What kind of message does that send to your team in April?
The answer is: "We're going to trade the only guy who is hitting for prospects." or put another way: "we give up, thanks for coming."
Posted by: yt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:33 PM
yahoo is reporting that howard is day to day and does not have to undergo an MRI...is their report from after the game last night?????
Posted by: Dan | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:35 PM
I actually liked the Burrell to 1st base suggestion if Howard hits the DL. Allows Werth/Dobbs/Bourn to get some ab's...anybody but Nunez!
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:36 PM
@ AE
I don't think the Phils should move Burrell for all the reasons you specify, but I was responding to the floated idea that only 3-4 of the Phillies are safe from trades. I'm suggesting that this team will NOT be gutted and overhauled because it's neither feasible (the issue of uneven value in the Thome/Abreu trades, which you raise well) nor of current management's nature. Gillick is not going to turn into Ken Williams bc the team is 3-10 and start making incredibly aggressive trades. I defer all things Phillies to you and the rest of the board, but I thought I had a valid point that this team isn't going to be vastly different in '08 from what it is now. The non-core pieces to the puzzle were muffed for the Phils this year and many of them will change, but the idea that you're going to see new stars out there instead of current ones is silly I think.
Posted by: Lister | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:45 PM
the info that fljerry posted is also whats on the mlb section of espn.com, guess we have to wait about 15 more minutes till game time for more info
Posted by: bsg | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:47 PM
As much as I like to lay the blame for the bullpen situation at Gillick's feet for not getting anyone of consequence in the offseason, can we all acknowledge that there was virtually no market for relief pitching this past winter? For crying out loud, the Braves traded a 32-homer guy (Adam Laroche) to get Mike Gonzalez. Mike Gonzalez!!
Seriously, does anyone think Gillick could have gotten anything of value for Jon Lieber?
Posted by: Matt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Here's the sad thing- even if the Phils win today, I don't give a flying two-fisted flip! One win solves nothing. Hell, even a 3-game winning streak at this point wouldn't even spark my optimism.
This team continues to plod along with a crappy bullpen (even with the addition of are #1 starting pitcher), an offense that can't hit with runners on base, and a manager that isn't a good manager. That's actually why I want Manuel fired. Not because this is ALL his fault, because only a portion of it is his, but I want him fired because he does his job poorly...piss-poor in face. When you do your job poorly, you get fired, whether you're the root of the problem or not. It makes no sense to continue losing with Manuel...he's part of the problem, so rid the team of what you can.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:53 PM
The Braves also got Rafael Soriano for Horacio Ramirez. Horacio Ramirez!!!
Soriano is a better bullpen option than any single Philly. Schuerholz went out and addressed his team's deficiencies, Gillick did not. Maybe he overpaid for Gonzalez, but the idea that getting bullpen arms was impossible just doesn't hold water.
Posted by: Lister | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:56 PM
Walker, Bradford, Baez signed by the O's alone...better than Madson/Smith.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 12:57 PM
Carson the owners gave a hard salary cap to PG. He couldn't have signed any of those RP because it would have cost to much. The O's extremely overpaid for them.
Posted by: The Reverend | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:04 PM
Not to mention the fact that a big bat/right fielder to hit behind Howard was never acquired.
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:04 PM
I like Bradford, but otherwise, I dunno and with Gillick's Seattle ties, he couldn't land Soriano tells me something.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:06 PM
Rev, since he had already signed a fifth starter in Eaton would it not have made more sense to spend the money being paid to Garcia on at least 2 quality relievers?
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Now if we couldn't get a reliever how were we going to get a big bat too?
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:07 PM
1 million to Werth
7.5 million to Eaton
2.5 million to Baraja....I think they could have afforded a relief pitcher.
Posted by: GM-Carson | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:08 PM
Remember, not only does he have a hard salary cap to work under, but if he never drafted a guy with another organization he is not allowed by MLB regulations (I assume) to bring him in here.
Seems like a strange rule I know, and why it only applies to him and not the other GMs who can say? But those are the rules.
Posted by: yt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:13 PM
I wouoldnt trade any of our "name" players. The problems are manager, 3B, bullpen and the bench.
Posted by: That Dude | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:14 PM
Also, didn't the former batboy turned assistant GM say that the Phillies could still sign a big bat after they had traded for Garcia?
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:14 PM
I did think Alou would have been a nice little addition to the OF. Haven't looked at his numbers, but he's consistent, I think. Maybe not a "big bat", but an experienced hitter.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:14 PM
Hey that dude do you think this is a good outfield?
Posted by: Dave Kingman | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:16 PM
Maybe the team will ante up in Howard's absence and start playing ball. Maybe he'll return in a few days to a team with some new fire. Or maybe the rest of the season will suck.
Posted by: Ryan | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:25 PM
DK, we have a RFer who can hit a little, steal and has a strong glove and arm. We have CFer who can hit a little less, but never quits on any play (his arms has been disappointing so far though) and a LF who's glove may be below average, but he'll hit around .280, knock 30+ HRs and drive in 100.
You couple that and our SPs with a bullpen that can hold a lead and an above average 3B and we're talking playoffs.
Barajas is a total joke and if PG could swallow his pride and let Coste and Ruiz tag team that position would be fine.
Would I rather have Guerrero, Sizemore and Beltran? Sure, but none of them will be striking guys out in the eighth inning with a 2 run lead.
Posted by: yt | Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 01:29 PM