Cole Hamels (9-9, 4.41) goes for his 10th win of the season when the Phillies finish their series with Ross Detwiler (0-5, 6.71) and the woeful Nationals. First pitch is 7:05. Ben Francisco gets the start in right field and bats sixth.

« Beer nuts: BlueClaws can clinch SAL title tonight | Main | Postgame: Phils cruise past Nats for series sweep »
The comments to this entry are closed.



Visit Sports Gambling.com, your online sportsbook for live baseball betting odds.
Anyone else get the feeling that Cole's just about ready for the postseason? It's sure been nice seeing him deal the last couple of times out.
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:14 PM
Game on!
Lets get the sweep!
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:14 PM
To CJ: Yes, yes I do. His struggles have actually helped keep his innings down (along with that injury in April. The upside is he should be fresh for Oct.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:15 PM
Good work Jimmy...keep it on the ground and get on base.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:16 PM
haha, charles dickens for the home run jackpot? i wonder if some english major just wanted to enter a fake name never thinking it would get picked.
Posted by: drake | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:18 PM
It's all about clicking and finding your groove at the right time. And chance that we'll have a healthy pen when October rolls around?
Posted by: Pops | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:19 PM
Utley at 91 RBI
Werth at 88 RBI
Raul at 86 RBI
Which will actually make it to 100?
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:21 PM
I mean Utley at 90...don't know why I wrote 91.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Utley's at 90 RBI actually
Posted by: patthebat4ever | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Around twenty games left? You would have to say - all three. Depends on how Charlie plays the regulars when the opportunity presents itself.
Posted by: Pops | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:27 PM
when was the last time the phils won three straight divisions?
Posted by: drake | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:34 PM
drake: The only other time in franchise history was 1976, 1977, and 1978. They lost the NLCS each time.
Posted by: J.R. King | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:39 PM
Reds already up 3-0 on the Fish
Posted by: MSH | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:41 PM
I need some guidance here. How many scoreless innings do they have to have against Detwiler before it's appropriate to start bitching?
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:45 PM
I give them at least 1-2 times through the lineup. They'll start hammering him soon.
Hamels looks strong.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:48 PM
Man, what a lost year for Hamels. He sucks. Way too soft.
Posted by: Jack | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:48 PM
You're kidding, right Jack?
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:50 PM
Not that I ever thought otherwise, but at this point it's a lock that Hamels is our #1 starter in the playoffs. For as good as Lee has been, if a guy carries you to a WS title, you keep giving him the chance do so until he proves he can't.
Posted by: Brian G | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Jack is like the guy who turns into a werewolf every time there's a full moon. Every time Cole Hamels has a halfway decent game, Jack transforms into clout.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:55 PM
Throw out the 2 rain-delay games,and Pedro's first 5 games were great. Lee's first 5 games were also great. What if Pedro's final 3 starts are similar to what Lee's next 3 were? Is he still a lock for playoff starter,or would that depend on how Happ does?
Posted by: goody | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:55 PM
NEPP: Considering this is Ross Dewtwiler -- quite possibly the worst starting pitcher we have faced all year -- I say bitching commences after the 4th inning.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:58 PM
Hamels hasn't thrown a changeup this inning...clearly he's tired or fatigued.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:59 PM
Have we ever faced Detwiler before? If not, I am totally unsurprised at this so far. They'll put some runs up and Hamels has looked good so far.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 07:59 PM
If Pedro was any shorter he wouldn't of caught that!
Posted by: Reverend | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:01 PM
Great play by Pete!
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Pete was just tall enough for that one.
Posted by: goody | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:03 PM
The Nats broadcaster or foreshadowing the unmentionable..not cool, it's only the 4th
Posted by: Conan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:04 PM
Wow, height played a factor on the hot corner. Would figgins have caught that?
Posted by: mvptommyd | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:05 PM
If he was taller he wouldnt have had to jump so high.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:05 PM
He's shrunk a bit because Charlie has played him too much.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Ok, I now feel 100% justified in saying that this is an absolutely pathetic display of offense.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:08 PM
The incredible shrinking 3rd baseman.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:08 PM
And now they are flashing the Hamels scoreless inning stat. Shut up Nats broadcasters.
Posted by: Conan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:11 PM
Funny, I feel 100% justified in saying this is a brilliant display of pitching.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:11 PM
It's been such a long time since we clubbed some hapless pitcher into submission.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:13 PM
Wow Hamels. Nats broadcasters just mentioned the P word.
Posted by: Conan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:14 PM
Son of a dirty arse ho, have the Phillies turned into the Giants? Another lame starter shutting them down.
Posted by: Kool Earl | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:14 PM
Wow!! Hamels is PERFECT through 5!!! Completely perfect!!! Go Phils!!!
Posted by: Kevin Costello | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:16 PM
I'm don't thinking and talking about..not until later.
Posted by: Conan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:18 PM
I can't speak English...
Posted by: Conan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:20 PM
See BAP, I told you we'd start breaking through.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:21 PM
I love seeing those towels again!
Posted by: MSH | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Rollins seems like he is starting to come around a bit. But he probably doesn't have time to fulfill my prediction, made in early July, that he will wind up with a higher batting average than Pedro Feliz.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Take Hamels out now!
/preempted
Posted by: Unikruk | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:23 PM
I think it would have been much more appropriate to give Vic the night off instead of Raul.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Go Jimmy! And Ross Deltwilerererer or whatever is being taken out of the game..bring on that Nats bullpen, lets score some runs.
Posted by: thames | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:24 PM
And there goes the perfect game and no no...ah well, go get em Cole.
Posted by: thames | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:26 PM
Is it some sort of rule that every d*ck in the world has to come out of the woodwork and try to jinx a perfect game?
Posted by: Iceman | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Don't look now but:
Hamels post ASB splits coming into tonight are starting to look VERY similar to last year.
2009 (coming into tonight and dropping as we speak)
11 GS, 4-4, 71 IP, 3.30 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, 2.4 BB/9, 7.9 K/9, 0.89 HR/9, .239 BAA
2008
13 GS, 5-4, 84 2/3 IP, 2.98 ERA, 1.18 WHIP, 2.0 BB/9, 7.4 K/9, 1.07 HR/9, .248 BAA
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Oh well. At least now I can focus my wrath on the offensive ineptitude, without getting side-tracked by the fact that our guy has a perfect game going.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:27 PM
It's not always a given that a lousy pitcher is going to automatically pitch lousy. Detweiler looked decent tonight, though he should have been abused in the first inning. That being said, I am deeply concerned about the offense going forward based on the last five innings.
Posted by: Iceman | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:29 PM
****Is it some sort of rule that every d*ck in the world has to come out of the woodwork and try to jinx a perfect game? ****
Yes, yes there is.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:29 PM
Those towels are completely bush league. They look like something you would see them hand the fans in AZ or FL. Just say no.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Iceman: The idea that you can jinx a perfect game by talking about it is just silly superstitious nonsense. The real reason that perfect game ended was because of the Beerleaguer Reverse Jinx.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Guess that single pissed Cole off...3 straight Ks.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:33 PM
Where I am watching, the game isn't quite over yet, but why is anyone concerned about the offense based on 5 innings? Give Detwiler some credit.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:34 PM
No Dunn tonight but this is much better the pathetic Giants' and Nats' lineup that Hamels blanked earlier this month. Nice to see Hamels just getting first strike after first strike and then making this lineup eat offspeed pitch after offspeed pitch.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:34 PM
BAP: so the BL jinx trumps all? Can a jinx be jinxed by the BL jinx?
Posted by: Iceman | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:35 PM
Looks like the master plan the rest of the way is to have our starters throw 9 and eek out a run somehow. We're resting the hitters in situ.
Posted by: curt | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:35 PM
How many more runs do we need to score before we can complain about Manuel not removing Hamels?
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Minimum of a 5-0 lead to go that route, CJ.
Anything less and it'd be legit to keep Cole in there.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Pirates' lineup but this looks very much like Sept. '08 Hamels. Impressive to watch and tonight if the kind of game where I don't mind seeing Hamels a bit but Cholly has to be a bit leary of Hamels giving up a late inning HR as he is prone to do.
Need another run here or two.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:38 PM
At what point do we realize that Howard's typical year-end tear came 3 weeks earlier this year, and ended 3 weeks earlier?
That's OK, because maybe he'll cycle back to Hot in October.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:39 PM
If Kool Earl took a drink every time that McCarthy or Sarge said the word "hat" between the 4-6 innings most nights, he would likely pass out.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Iceman: Researchers at Brown University have found that the Beerleaguer Reverse Jinx overpowers any other jinxes with which it competes. I would assume that means it can jinx another jinx. So, for instance, if some poster had come along in the 6th inning and whined about the way Hamels was pitching, it would have overpowered all posts which talked about his no-hitter, & would have caused him to throw another hitless inning.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:43 PM
This has the Pete Happy DP Special written all over it.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:44 PM
One clear improvement in coaching of the 2008 Phils vs. 2009 Phils:
Sam Perlozzo
Only a couple of times I have remembered a guy getting thrown out at home and I can't remember a single time this year where a Phils' play was waived around by Sam and out by 15-20 feet.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:46 PM
I preempted you, CJ, you're preempted. No mas.
Posted by: Unikruk | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Nice, productive out.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:46 PM
BAP, I tried, I really did. I really meant it.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Time to come up big, Chooch.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Shorten that swing, Chooch
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:48 PM
These stats are for Denny:
John Mayberry through 53 ABS: .189/.232/.526
Ben Francisco through 60 ABs: .250/.317/.583
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:49 PM
Don't swing Cole.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:49 PM
Good work chooch.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:50 PM
"Pedro is seeing the ball better" lately.
Yeah hitting .190 this month with a line of .230/.345/.574 is impressive.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Pedro Martinez is doing that well with the bat?
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:50 PM
well hopefully this game ends before It's Always Sunny!
Posted by: thames | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:50 PM
This situation is a perfect example of why NL teams score less than AL teams.
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:51 PM
It worked!!!
Posted by: SmokyJoe | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Prediction: Cole hits a grand slam.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Glad someone can hit with RISP.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Best to way to get help - help yourself.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
COLE HELPING HIS CAUSE!
Posted by: thames | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
That's Coletastic!
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:53 PM
Prediction: Rollins hits a grand slam.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:54 PM
Bad play by Cole... he increased the chance that Manuel will be forced to remove him from the game to save his arm.
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:54 PM
I think we need to start sending emails about T-Mac again. It seems obvious to me that they gave him some notes about 1/3 through the season and he started talking less, getting less excited on opposition home runs, etc. But lately he seems to be exhibiting the announcer version of reversion to the mean.
By which I mean he sucks again.
Posted by: Jonesman | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:55 PM
b_a_p is now dabbling in stand-up comedy.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:55 PM
Shut up about the towels TMac. They are a cheap marketing ploy that so many other professional sports teams have used.
I was pissed off last year when idiot fans would be waiving them around in front of you so you can't see what the hell is going on at the field at the playoff game I went to vs. Dodgers.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Prediction: my next prediction, whatever it is, will be wrong.
Posted by: bay_area_phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Hamels has 2 less RBI than Bruntlett on the season.
Posted by: Dave X | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Quite a pop-up.
Posted by: Unikruk | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:57 PM
I think Cole might be getting his swagger back. Just in time!
Posted by: Spitz | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Hamels is better hitter than Bruntlett...and likely a better utility infielder.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Hamels is taller than Bruntlett
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:58 PM
4 pitches Cole?!? Damnit, learn how to do it in 3!
That's the best I can come up with tonight.
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Rally towels are something they have to hand out in mediocre baseball towns to get the fans excited. They are no better than other terrible things including the "thunder sticks" and the ridiculous cowbells.
Why can't fans just stand up and make noise instead? Would the Yanks had out "rally towels?" I think not.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Wheels coming off...
Posted by: NEPP | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Thunder Sticks were developed in Satan's Laboratory.
Posted by: Scott | Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 09:01 PM