Raul Ibanez's 8th-inning single drove in Chase Utley from second to snap a 4-4 tie, and Jose Contreras worked out of a first-and-third, no-out jam in the 9th, as the Phillies beat the Cubs 5-4 to split their two game set.
Beerleaguer: In a
game of standout performers, the excellence of Chase Utley shined brightly. The All-Star second baseman sent a solo shot
over the right-field fence in the first, but contributed just as much
with his base-running savvy on Ibanez's game-winning single.
Jimmy Rollins accounted for the bulk of the Phillies' scoring with a
three-run homer. And just when it looked like the Cubs had located the
Phils' pressure point in the 'pen, tying the game 4-4 on a Kosuke
Fukudome homer off Antonio Bastardo in the eighth, Danys Baez retired
the next three batters, then Contreras ended it with a pair of
strikeouts and a pop-out. This was a true save situation, the first in
the post-Brad Lidge and Ryan Madson era. After Contreras found the
strike zone, perhaps rusty from a five-day layoff, the 38-year-old
rookie closer handled the ninth with poise, and is absolutely unafraid to pitch inside.




I enjoyed Contreras' lack of control. Many of his misses (without going back to look) were tight and inside to right handers, and the strike three swinging to the completely astray A Ramirez was some entertainment.
That battle with Soriano was particularly good.
Posted by: Sophist | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:04 PM
The main story is going to be Contreras in the 9th, but I'm glad you pointed out Utley's baserunning. Drawing the walk and scoring on Ibanez's single was classic Utley. So was tagging up and getting to 2nd on Howard's fly ball the AB before Rollins' HR.
Utley really is one of the best baserunners I've ever seen.
Posted by: Jack | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:07 PM
My vote for the T-shirt:
Front: "This game feels like a loss."
Beerleaguer.typepad.com
Rear: Philadelphia Phillies Record
2007 -- W89, L73
2008 -- W92, L70
2009 -- W93, L69
MLB World Champions, 2008
Posted by: philwynk | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:08 PM
Contreras is not afraid to pitch inside.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:09 PM
Spot on write up. Only other thing that crosses my mind: it's good to get some guys a touch of rest, including the bullpen, before interleague gets underway.
Posted by: PhilliesRed | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:22 PM
I don't usually do this, but the headline should read "Tie-breaking."
***********
Nice win today. For comparison sake, our record through 40 games:
2010: 25-15 4.0 ahead
2009: 23-17 1.5 ahead
2008: 22-18 1.5 behind
2007: 20-20 5.0 behind
1993: 28-12 5.5 ahead
1983: 20-20 3.5 behind
1980: 22-18 1.0 behind
Posted by: CJ | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 06:24 PM
I don't think a single person on here predicted that Contreras was going to be the Phils' closer for a prolonged stretch in the 1st half.
If you had told me that before the season, I would have told you the bullpen was in shambles. Instead, it has gotten some strong early performances from Durbin & Contreras and more importantly not been overexposed this season.
Not surprised though the bullpen began to post better numbers since Blanton came back & Moyer/KK both were pretty damn solid too.
Harder to say who has been the most pleasant surprise in the early going but Moyer gets my vote over Contreras. Not only been giving the Phils the inning they need (and didn't get form his last year) but he has been very effective the past month to boot.
Posted by: MG | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:10 PM
2 parades in one year? I can't wait.
Has Charlie or Jimmy commented on the new lineup and how long they think it will continue?
Also, when will the Phillies start running again?
Posted by: gobaystars | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:12 PM
From Zolecki:
Rollins is 4-for-7 with a double, two home runs and six RBIs when he puts a ball in play on a 3-0 count. (He also has walked 120 times in that situation.)
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:13 PM
I agree, MG, although I would add that Moyer is All Washed UP(TM). And Kyle Kendrick will never be a big league pitcher.
Posted by: philwynk | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:13 PM
We always say: "Chase is the man!!" Though that remains true, now we can also chant: "Contreras is the man!!!"
Posted by: Lake Fred | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:17 PM
"1993: 28-12 5.5 ahead"
Conclusion? Steroids are worth 3 wins.
Posted by: The Players Club | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:43 PM
This promotional item
R-Phils Promotional Item
R-Phils August 2010 Promotional Schedule
is disturbing for several reasons, not the least of which is the fact that clearly the Reading Phillies organization does not follow Beerleaguer. At all. Howard the Gnome? I think not!
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:53 PM
G-Town, that is going to give me nightmares.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:54 PM
Old Phan: Somehow I don't think that thing was what Ryan had in mind when he signed the MLBPA Licensing Agreement.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 07:56 PM
Whoever did that is getting a Subway $5 foot long where the sun don't shine.
Posted by: Old Phan | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 08:00 PM
Yous all got a seriously lacking sense of the absurd.
Like the Chase Utley Cheesesteak tee, the Howard garden gnome is so wrong it's gloriously right. I'll be driving from Brooklyn to Reading just to get one. Promotion win.
Posted by: Lincoln Hawkes | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 08:43 PM
I wish i could get a ryan howard gnome.
Posted by: gobaystars | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 09:53 PM
I'm sorry if this was mentioned earlier but why wasn't Romero in Bastardo's place? Is it rest for Romero or testing Bastardo?
Posted by: philly_transplant | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 09:56 PM
I'd rather have Howard be the gnome on this team than the Gnome be the gnome.
In re: 1993
I remember that start. The key to the hot April and May was the starting pitching. Those guys were horses on a mission. The needle probably helped them too.
Posted by: Andy | Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 11:04 PM
In the course of yesterday's game thread MG was wondering what record the Phillies had accrued in Businessperson's Specials since CBP opened in '04. Thanks to the crapfest that was last night's Flyers game, I had the time to go back through the relevant Media Guides & find an answer. Said answer is not pretty ...
The Phillies have played 43 designated Businessperson's Specials from 04/15/2004 through 05/20/2010. Their overall record in those games is 15-28, or a .349 winning percentage. The breakdown is as follows:
'10 2-1 *
'09 2-4
'08 4-3
'07 1-6
'06 1-6
'05 3-4
'04 2-4
* 3 more BPS are scheduled for the 2010 Season.
The prior ugliness is as compared to the Phillies overall record in Regular Season Day Games at CBP over the same period of 94-64 (158 Games), a .595 winning percentage.
Just for poos 'n' chuckles, I also found that the Phillies are 86-76 (162 Games, a .531 WP) in Regular Season Day Games on the Road in that period, which makes for a grand total of 180-140 (320 Games, a .563 WP) for All Regular Season Day Games from 04/15/2004 through 5/20/2010.
Overall, the Phillies have done remarkably poorly in Businessperson's Specials since CBP opened in '04. How poorly? They actually have a better winning percentage in Home Interleague Play Games (same period, 51 Games, 20-31, a .392 WP), All Interleague Play Games (same period, 99 Games, 39-60, a .394 WP) & even Road Interleage Play Games (same period, 48 Games, 19-29, a .396 WP).
So by all means, go to a Day Game -- hell, go to an Interleague Game -- but if you want a better chance of seeing the Fightins win avoid the BPS at all costs.
Posted by: GTown_Dave | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:20 AM
I can think of a couple of great BPS wins...the big comeback vs the Braves on WFC ring day last year, the epic comeback vs Billy Wagner to sweep the Mets in 2007. So you just might see a classic game if you don't avoid a BPS.
Was kinda hoping JW might have changed the spelling mistake in the headline by now. Don't expect perfection, but they aren't as jarring if they're not in bold at the top.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 06:25 AM
Don't look now, but Phils have second best record in MLB, behind only that team they beat in the WFS in 2008. Remember, we were very lucky to get to play them instead of some real team like the Red Sox.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 06:28 AM
Our 3 starters each have a better ERA than the Red Sox pitchers they're facing in the series, even KK.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 07:16 AM
Fixed the spelling error. Product of racing the clock to get it posted.
Posted by: J. Weitzel | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 08:14 AM
No worries, just stood out since it's in the tabs when you visit...
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 08:54 AM
EFF: That Mets game in 2007 was a Sunday if my memory serves me correctly.
Posted by: Bay Slugga | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 09:37 AM
EF: what do you mean? The Phils beat the 2012 Red Sox!
Posted by: Pete Happy | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 09:39 AM
Ya'll forget the 2001 Phillies, who were 25-17 on May 20 (ahead 5 games). Went 13-2 btwn May17 and June1. And were 8 games ahead on June1. Then the bottom slowly fell out...some stats from http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/PHI/2001-schedule-scores.shtml. But I do remember them being ahead by a lot in the middle of summer, and knowing it wouldnt last :(
Posted by: Mike Smith | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 09:52 AM
Nope, the great Wagner vs Burrell game was a thursday afternoon. The sweep in New York a few weeks later was on a sunday.
That was maybe the greatest baseball game I have ever seen. Werth running all over LoDuca and the Rat was great. The constant shots of Burrell on deck at the end of the game. Gooch's pop up slide at the plate and the celebration that followed. Amazing game.
Posted by: gobaystars | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:02 AM
Speaking of the Mets, they actually took Maine out of the game yesterday 5 pitches into a start! You can't make this stuff up. Their 3-4-5 starters are all out of the rotation now.
Posted by: UD Hens | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:11 AM
I'm not sure why, but I trust Contreras to get the job done moreso than I would Lidge or Madson.
Posted by: Beer-a-thn | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:19 AM
I think the reason some people would trust Contreras more than Lidge or Madson is because they have yet to see him fail.
Sort of a baseball-tinged inversion of the "better the devil you know" idiom.
Posted by: Noah | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM
@Mike Smith--it looks like our starting rotation in the home stretch of that season was Omar Daal, Brandon Duckworth, Dave Coggin, Robert Person, and Randy Wolf. Feels a little different this year, doesn't it?
Posted by: phatti | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Yesterday was Werth's birthday.
Which means either:
A) Chollie left him rest because of the BIG DAY.
B) Everything's gonna be downhill from now on./He's washed up. (He hasn 't had a single hit since he turned 31!)
C) That beard's gonna look especially funky today after last night's Werthday Party.
D) He gets to catch today.
Posted by: Andy | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Noah - I like that explanation, but I also like Contrares' 20-2 K-BB ratio and his sub-1 WHIP.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Howard through 40 games
06: .297/.352/.566 -- 13 BB / 40 SO - 3 2B, 0 3B, 12 HR
07: .231/.387/.500 -- 36 BB / 48 SO - 6 2B, 0 3B, 10 HR*
08: .181/.286/.368 -- 22 BB / 56 SO - 4 2B, 1 3B, 7 HR
09: .258/.339/.528 -- 18 BB / 50 SO - 11 2B, 1 3B, 10 HR
10: .304/.350/.482 -- 11 BB / 40 SO - 7 2B, 1 3B, 7 HR
Thought it was interesting how few BB Howard had through 40 games in 2006. He had just as many IBB thru 40 as this year as well (3).
It's actually something that he's been able to maintain a higher BA than 06 despite 6 fewer HR. His HR/FB so far is %17.5 so far this year compared to 34.9% in 06. His LD rate is up a tad and we've seen plenty of hits through the shift early on.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM
yeah you don't have numbers like that and think someone is going to fail. the only thing I would have thought is that can he handle it mentally and I really think that he can
Posted by: st | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM
* for 07 is to mark that he had a DL stint. He was out from May 10th to the 24th so his 40th game didn't come til June 5th. The 07 start was strange for this reason but also because he got 16 IBB to start the year. .231/.387 - he was just getting pitched around. Makes those XBH more impressive.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:02 AM
actually 34.9% was his HR/FB in 05 - His rate in 06 was 39.5%
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM
I think Contreras will certainly be a positive contributor for the Phillies this season. His stuff passes the eye test and any time he comes in after a Moyer start he must be a nightmare to pick-up/hit.
However, his career K/BB tends to sit closer to 2.00 (slightly worse than Madson, nearly a full K/BB worse than Lidge) than to 10 (we saw some of this yesterday when he was super wild and extremely lucky to strike out Aramis Ramirez with a slider that never looked like a strike). Also, his WHIP almost has to go up.
I'm not saying he won't be effective in a late inning high leverage role long-term. Just that he will fail at some point and it shouldn't mean people should become uncomfortable with him closing or make sweeping judgments about his mental state (I'm predicting he'll never get a "too laissez-faire" accusation from these fans but perhaps a "squeezing it, gets too nervous" accusation will be in order), just that everyone fails sometimes in baseball.
Posted by: Noah | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM
Contreres has the look least like DITHL - He looks like the deer would be venison and the truck with the headlights would be in a chop shop before the ump calls the first pitch.
Posted by: Bubba | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Acc. to USA Today, "among contenders", Phils have the toughest interleague opposition by winning percentage. Easiest? Wash. Nats, who don't play a divisional foe for another 5+ weeks.
Posted by: Hugh Mulcahy | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Noah, of course he will. The question is how much his peripherals and success will change, and I'm not sure how on point his career numbers are -- he's never been a relief pitcher before. We'll have to wait and see.
Posted by: Sophist | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 11:30 AM
I was at the R-Phils-Senators game yesterday (love the 10:20 a.m. start time) and had a few observations and questions:
1. Why wasn't Gillies playing?
2. Why wasn't Tuffy Goosewurst playing?
3. Dom Brown both looks better and plays better than anyone else on the R-Phils.
4. Galvis had a chance to make a great play on a slow roller, but didn't make the pickup.
5. Drew Naylor got off to a shaky start, partly because of poor control and partly because of poor defense by something named Mike Spidale in LF.
6. For a slap hitter, Quentin Berry swings at an awful lot of pitches out of the strike zone. I'm thinking his upside may be Chris Roberson.
7. R-Phils tied game 2-2 in 8th, but Escalona immediately coughed up 3 hits to weak-hitting Senators and lost 3-2.
Posted by: clout | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Note to self: Don't got to a Reading Phils game.
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Clout: How did Brown look defensively in the OF?
Posted by: Jack | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Clout- Gillies is on the DL with a hamstring injury, you are probably right on Q. Berry, and Brown is awesome to watch in person.
Posted by: Jonesman | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Here's the BL post from 2007 confirming the BPS status of the finale of the 4 game sweep vs the Mets. It was a glorious Thursday afternoon.
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:18 PM
I'm thinking [Quentin Berry's] upside may be Chris Roberson.
If that's true, I think it's time for Berry to get his real estate license.
Posted by: R.Billingsly | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:20 PM
Posted by: EastFallowfield | Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM